Talk:Critique

Philosophy Mid‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I've made some sweeping revisions to this piece - it was full of unsupported (and in some cases unsupportable!) assertions, with very few citations to back it up. I've limited my changes to deleting sections that are both dubious and uncited, and adding citations to claims that can be backed up. I also moved a paragraph on critique vs criticism from the introduction to its own section, since it did not make sense in the header to the article. (Actually, I'm not even sure this is needed, but it is correctly cited to Vattimo so I have left it in). I removed the citation warning, on the basis of these changes. However, I believe this page still needs work - it ought to include discussion of Marxist critique, Feminist critique, and perhaps also Feminist-Marxist critique for completeness. I've been able to tidy it up a bit, but I'm not in a position to flesh it out any further than this. ChrisBateman (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Yasleenk.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural History of the Concept[edit]

This article badly needs a survey of the history of the concept and practice of "critique", starting with the ancient greek philosophers and rhetoric. It also badly needs a cross-cultural examination of the concept of "critique". The work of Geoffrey E.R. Lloyd, which deals with comparing ancient greek and ancient chinese practices of scientific discourse would be an excellent source for the section covering cross-cultural perspectives on "critique". --Thewolf37 (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]