Talk:Criticism of Comcast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment, not by me!--DThomsen8 (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[edit]

{{Why do we pay Comcast to watch commercials? Are we crazy do we pay our car radio? VotefreeComcast.com on your smartphone device, Comcast charges, If we vote 1 million, Nielsen ratings reports, When one million people vote free tv, Hollywood and sponsors will react, Otherwise we can just continue to pay Comcast and other providers charging to watch commercials.}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freecomcast (talk • contribs) 10:17, 13 October 2013‎

"Criticism" inaccurate[edit]

"Criticism of Comcast" does not seem to be an appropriate title for this article; there are almost no claims of criticism throughout the article. A title of "Comcast sucks" would be more accurate, given the article's current state. Can someone bring some WP:SECONDARY commentary into the article? Deadbeef 04:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the controversy?[edit]

Having read this article, I have a difficult time identifying just where it lacks neutrality. It describes many specific controversies caused by actions of Comcast, describes relevant criticisms (made both by specific entities like the FCC and in aggregate form via the American Customer Satisfaction Index), provides many relevant citations and refrains from making value judgements on Comcast's actions. Perhaps the title should be changed from "Criticism of Comcast" to "Controversies surrounding Comcast" but insofar as the article's content, the allegations of disputed neutrality seem completely unfounded. I propose the article title be changed and the warning removed. 173.116.193.118 (talk) 10:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, not seeing any disputes here. Why is it tagged with NPOV problems? It seems to me for that tag to be there, somebody should at least come up with a list of problem areas that can be improved. Just making a blanket statement that it is "not neutral" means it can't be fixed because to must of us, it appears perfectly neutral. I 100% agree that the tag should be removed. I see no neutrality issues and until somebody actually points out the issues then it shouldn't be considered disputed.66.220.250.160 (talk) 15:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What critiques are and aren't allowed on this page[edit]

I recently had 2 sourced critiques removed from the page about comcast. I was just wondering what the criteria is for allowing a critique on the page or not? they were both verifiable and accurate. Is this page only for negative criticism?Bryce Carmony (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Criticism implies things that are negative and/or should be changed about a company, a product, a piece of art, etc. What you've posted are positive factoids. Unless you think that Comcast should change its stance on diversity and its hiring practices (i.e. that they shouldn't hire minorities, should be more restrictive, old fashioned and even racist, etc.), then these items do not belong here. Constablequackers (talk) 11:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I get it so this is a content fork where anything negative goes here only. got it.Bryce Carmony (talk) 10:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The rest of the article talks about all the positives, this section provides a balance to that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "rest of the article"? what part of Criticism of Comcast is for the positives?Bryce Carmony (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

/r/Circlejerk[edit]

Should the article talk about the /r/circlejerk raid to associate Comcast with images of Swaztikas? Does this belong to the original article or to this one? Does this even belong on the wiki? I'm new, so I prefer asking before editing. 79.53.0.204 (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Criticism of Comcast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Criticism of Comcast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Criticism of Comcast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of Comcast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Criticism_of_Comcast&oldid=1204746448"