Talk:Crash Bash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ePSXe[edit]

I notice that your screenshot for this game was made using the ePSXe emulator I am having trouble using the program especially with this game, and when I try and start adventure mode (running a cd rom) I get the error code: SPEC opcode 3f UNK (PC 0009ba98) (0009ba68) (12024,73)

Can you help me solve this problem?

small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.241.103.43 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CVG Assessment[edit]

This is in regards to your request at the CVG Assessment page. I have examined the article, and am keeping it at Start-class. A few tips on getting it to B-Class or higher-

  1. Everything from "Playable Characters" through "Mini-games" needs to be removed. Just take it out. Then, rewrite the playable characters into a short paragraph saying who is in the game, though not their taunts or such.
  • I did that for you. FictionH 00:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • No you didn't. That had already been done a long time ago. What you did was completely vandilise the page.
  • What the hell?! I did what he said, take out Playable Characters and re-write them without saying anything about them, damn it! FictionH 23:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did you not read the date that had been written? Did you also not read the way the article was written BEFORE that was posted? Obviously not. The playable characters section had already been completely re-written, so your 'efforts' were uncalled for. Besides, it isn't fair on Bash. Check dates before editing/vandalising. That's what I've always been told.
  • That doesn't matter. Crash Bash only has 8 playable characters, none of them showing any personality in-game and differing only in abilities. Devoting an entire encyclopedia section to something that belongs in a game guide on GameFaqs is nothing short of utter fanboy nonsense. There's two of us and one of you, and please sign your posts using the four tildes from now on. And one last thing: Is this any way to behave? Let's assume good faith here and solve the problem in a civilized, Wikipedian manner. Thank you. Cat's Tuxedo 20:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then it is not fair on Bash, as the Team Racing, Nitro Kart and Tag Team Racing articles are all set out in an identical way and nobody complains about them. Heck, all the other games have a similar set-up, regardless of genre, but no one complains about them. FictionH edited something that had already been adjusted, and didn't need further adjustment. There may be two of you, but you two obviously don't like Bash. Treat it like the other games, why don't you? Also, may I point out that FictionH has been known to vandalise other pages before. There is nothing wrong with the article as it stands, and removing the basic descriptions will give NO information whatsoever. Also, how is it like a Game-Guide? It doesn't even tell you what they do. (P.S. What's the point of putting my sig? I'm only acting as a guest, so there isn't a point)
  • Hum. Then I'm going to have to check up on those other pages later. And on the contrary, I happen to be a Crash Bandicoot fan myself, but I think that the perfection of Wikipedia is more important than my own personal interests. Plus, FictionH has said on his talk page that he shares his account with his son, who is most likely a human child and is therefore more likely to vandalise Wikipedia for a cheap laugh. Conclusively, it might not be FictionH himself commiting all those vandalisms. And one more thing, the reason why we sign our sigs here is so that the conversation will be less confusing to people who visit this talk page and use it as reference for future edits. Thank you. Cat's Tuxedo 21:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either way, I still think it is beneficial. I did remove the 'pointless' trivia section mind. 80.47.211.67 21:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Expand the Reception section. Take that list of scores and throw it into a table (See Final Fantasy VIII for a good table format to use), and then throw in some quotes from those reviews, saying what they felt about the game, what they liked, didn't like, etc. Also expand the soundtrack section if you can.
  1. Try to convert the list in the "Gameplay" section to prose.
  1. And the big one, find references. the Reception section is an easy one to get references for, but also try to reference other things in the article as well.

For more advice, check out the CVG GA's. There aren't any part game GAs, so you can be liberal in applying what they did, but you should be able to get some idea of what this article should look like. --PresN 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

false rerelease dates[edit]

this has to stop, unless you have a certifiable proof that it will be released on the PSN. stop posting these false, expired dates. 157.157.153.122 (talk) 21:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash Bash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Cat's Tuxedo (talk). Self-nominated at 17:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: QPQ done, and interesting hook. Nice work! –Ploni (talk) 02:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crash_Bash&oldid=1200879376"