Talk:Cow Tower, Norwich

Cow Tower, Norwich has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 1, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

The "Symbol" shown on this page is the symbol of English Heritage, not the bloody Cow Tower[edit]

See http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.128.192 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion...[edit]

I've gone through and given the article a thorough expansion; everything should be well cited now, but a copyedit would be useful. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cow Tower, Norwich/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed this article. I made a couple minor edits to correct what I thought were clear typos and only have a few minor comments to make:

Headings

Pedantic I know, but are the right dashes being used in the headings?

Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Should "artillery tower" be wikilinked (perhaps a potential article if it does not exist already)?
Should "parapets" be wikilinked?

Both are now wikilinked (I've found a temporary spot for artillery tower to link to).Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14th century

"...and then the "tower in the Hospital meadows"...": should "tower in the Hospital meadows" be in title case?

It's not in title case in any of the originals, so I'd gone for a direct quote and keeping in regular case. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15th - 16th centuries

"...with the Crown occasionally issuing instructions given it should be repaired.": Is there something missing here, or should "given" be deleted?

Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture

"The river bends around about 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) from the base of the tower, and its base may...": close repetition of base.

Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff

References look OK as does their formatting.
Duplicate link: Southampton.
No dab links
Checklink tool does not identify any issues.
Image tags look OK.

Link deduped. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, I found this an interesting and well written article with only the few minor nitpicks mentioned above. I'll check back for your response in a couple of days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should all be done, and thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All good, passing as GA. Zawed (talk) 11:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]