Talk:Coripe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coripe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cause célèbre?[edit]

I don't understand pretty well that controversy with the "Fuigdemont" thing. Actually, that was a local holiday in a small village from Andalucia known as "Fiesta or Quema del Judas" (Burning of Judas in English).However, Coripe is not the only place where that tradition takes place. According the article in Wikipedia: The burning of Judas is an Easter-time ritual in many Orthodox and Catholic Christian communities. And, what happens with Fuigdemont? Well. every year Coripe citizens vote for the most despicable person who deserve to be in the bonfire. For example: the last edition, they vote for burning a woman who murdered a boy. Obviously, it was a puppet, like this year. Those puppets represents the "bad things": last year a murderer, and this one a hated politician. --Ravave (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't see any international reaction of this, but national (Spanish media), so I could dare to say that the controversy is just in Spain. --Ravave (talk) 11:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know who "Fuigdemont" is, other than perhaps Puigdemont's surname pronounced by some individual with serious diction problems. The burning of Judas is controversial on an international level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Judas#Antisemitism), not just within the boundaries of Spain. CodeInconnu (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have enough diction to understand that you pretend to add something negative about a little village because somebody didn't liked to see the dummy of that person (that ranaway, by the way) in a bonfire. Your answer is just a cheap insult. Do you think "Coripe is this, Coripe is that", but Catalonia isn't different. For example: there also dummies (like the Coripe's one) of non-independentists hanged from bridges, or lynching towards anybody who don't want to follow the steps of the Catalonian Government (or ideologies), even for the language.[1].
Before to leave, I'm gonna tell you that I'm not gonna undo your edition, but I hope some users from this Wikipedia understands that with that edition, your intention is to show the Coripe citizens as retrograded people. --Ravave (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The use of the term "lynching" in this context is slanderous, even if it quotes a very questionable use of the word by a newspaper. Nobody lynched the owner of a restaurant in Barcelona. Also the dummies-on-bridges stunt was nocturnal, anonymous, disowned by all politicians and civic organisations and criticized by everybody across the political spectrum, whereas the Coripe episode was organized in broad daylight by the town council itself with the collaboration of local police and (even worse) local Parent–teacher association. Also I don't think "Coripe is this, Coripe is that", in fact I haven't spoken to any of its denizens nor do I have a uniform opinion about them. I've added properly referenced material and that's it. CodeInconnu (talk) 08:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Spanishes celebrities"...[edit]

English-language Wikipedia should be edited primarily by people with at least a passable command of English grammar. I don't think I'm saying anything controversial by stating this. CodeInconnu (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little mistake. Nothing to worry about it. --Ravave (talk) 23:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Spaniard celebrities" is just as awkward because Spaniard is a noun, not an adjective. And the correct phrase is "Nothing to worry about", without the "it". The entire text is full of mistakes. This encyclopedia needs people who are capable of constructive contributions. CodeInconnu (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]