Talk:Corinne, Utah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Universal Suffrage really caused by Corinne politics?[edit]

I have a question on this article. It states Utah accepted universal suffrage in order to stop Corinne from exercising too much control over state politics. This sounds more like folklore than truth. This fact has no citation. If true it is a vital bit of information. If false it is misleading to a key point in Utah history. Any thoughts? My preference is to delete until a solid reference can be found.Jumpinbean (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting Read but Doubt It[edit]

While there likely was contention between Americans and the then theocratic Mormons, the original train line running through Corinne was abandoned because a flatter, shorter route was built in 1904 (Lucin Cutoff). The hill at Promontory Point is actually long and steep (6% grade) and the steam engines of the day had a hard time with it. The rail line moved and Corinne dried up. End of story.

Moreover as a "Gentile in Utah" the bigotry a few Mormons exhibit does get old. I could see where many of the "Gentile" folk of Corinne simply moved off to the more progressive and prosperous environment of California. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.105.29 (talk) 06:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corinne, Utah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Corinne, Utah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]