Talk:Coregonus fontanae

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stechlin cisco → Coregonus fontanae — Most common name: three (unambigous) common names exist: detailed discussion below. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parentheses altered. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 20:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was the original name of this page, but I moved it to "Stechlin cisco" after finding it used at the IUCN Red List (ordinarily only FishBase names are used on Wikipedia). While none of the common names for this species refer to any other species, it looks like Stechlin cisco is used less commonly then Fontane or Fontane's cisco, and the scientific name is most commonly used, with two out of two references in the media using the name. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I gather Coregonus fontanae is the most prevalent name and Stechlin cisco is the least prevalent vernacular name. Is that correct? --Una Smith (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stechlin cisco is one of the two most common English vernaculars, more or less, and is used by the IUCN. Fontane cisco is used maybe as frequently, maybe more, and Fontane's once or twice. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 00:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coregonus fontanae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523152750/http://www.ilec.or.jp/database/eur/eur-31.html to http://www.ilec.or.jp/database/eur/eur-31.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]