Talk:Copts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCopts was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Wierd lettering?[edit]

ⲟⲩⲣⲉⲙ'ⲛⲭⲏⲙⲓ 'ⲛ'Ⲭⲣⲏⲥⲧⲓ'ⲁⲛⲟⲥ
The above comes out as apparent gibberish on my computer. Is it necessary? Could it be replaced with a png if so? Jubilee♫clipman 20:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fine and beautiful on mine. You probably need to download a unicode font, preferably "Athena". --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ[talk] 20:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to you I downloaded New Athena Unicode Font from GreekKeys, on Linux, for free, and it immediately appeared. Thank you. Claverhouse (talk) 07:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read it either. :( Capo (talk)


I was about to ask this, its not showing up for me either. - Yorkshirian (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2021[edit]

Footnote 90 "Compass Direct News. Church Building Regulations Eased" is a dead link. BeeGhoul (talk) 02:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Replaced dead archive link with one that is live twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 02:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do references start from 25?![edit]

why do references start from 25?! Aryamohamdyan (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the infobox on the right side of the screen; you shall see 24 references. Aearthrise (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted references[edit]

The references I added yesterday to the article were removed and the re-organization of the article was reverted, then I received a warning that I may be blocked! Can someone please explain this to me? Epenkimi (talk) 02:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User User:Fragrant Peony is insisting to engage in edit warring and continues to revert everything I post. Can an administrator please get involved here? Is there a way to reach out to administrator to look at this behavior? Thank you Epenkimi (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag[edit]

I suspect that this flag is the creation of an individual neo-vexillology enthusiast, & does not represent any organised body of Copts. I could very well be wrong! Does anyone have any info on a source? Pathawi (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I traced this down. It was made by a a group called Free Copts which may have never been more than one person, & which may have never had more than an on-line presence. Their site has been down for several years now. I can't find any indication that they ever had significant influence among Copts. I don't think this flag should be taken to represent the ethnicity as a whole. Pathawi (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - let's zap it. Many Wikipedians think everything should have a Western-style flag, but .... Johnbod (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]