Talk:Cooter (30 Rock)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Plot, this sentence ---> "Kenneth aspires to be an NBC page at the Beijing Olympics", you might want to explain what the sentence is talking about, I mean, I know what its talking about, but how 'bout your reader.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Production section, italicize "Weekend Update".
Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:
Is Hulu.com a reliable source?
Yes, it's owned by NBC and Fox Broadcasting Company. It's their streaming site. -- ^[User]Jamie JCA_[Talk] 22:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, just needed to know. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to improve the plot section and remove anything that is unclear. Is it better? Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 04:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its better now. Thank you to Cornucopia for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]