Talk:Convulsionnaires of Saint-Médard

Catholicism Low‑importance

Convulsionnaires of Saint-Médard is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New article[edit]

François de Pâris is a new creation: there is an argument for moving some of the biographical detail to it. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Error in quote from David Hume?[edit]

I am quite certain that the quote attributed to David Hume via reference [69] is incorrect. The quote given in this article agrees with the quotation presented in Talbot's "The Holographic Universe" but it looks like Talbot garbled the quote, giving it a meaning contrary to Hume's intent. The following URL reproduces (I think) Hume's original writing: http://www.bartleby.com/37/3/15.html . This apparent discrepancy should be resolved.

If the resolution of this matter shows that Michael Talbot made a serious, deliberate error in order to support his own viewpoint, which I currently suspect, then I think that all Wikipedia references to Talbot's works need to be reviewed for factual correctness. If other errors are found, I suggest removing all references to Talbot's works, unless individually validated.

Wcmead3 (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]