Talk:Continuity test

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

what about in math? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.16.1 (talk • contribs)

There is not continuity test in the classical math since what the classical math discussed is certainty.(Yuanfangdelang (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2010 (Amercian Eastern Time))

Moved from main article:

"If someone could formally declare this article incomplete, or make it redirect to a search for 2 sections, the continuity test for mathematics (continuous and discontinuous functions) and this. Sorry I don't edit wikipedia often, I know a mod will see this real quick."

These are not my words. --marqmike2 (talk) 04:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this[edit]

This article isn't ready for Wikipedia. Please remove it to your user page. (BTW, Wild and Seber's book on nonlinear regression has a lot on discontinuous regression.) Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, it is the new material on statistical continuity testing in regression analysis that needs to be removed. The material on continuity testing in electronics should stay. Skbkekas (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand why the continuity test (in Statistics/piecewise rengresison analysis) was deleted. This is a new concept in Statistics since a "discontinuity" is a random event that needs to be tested and inferred in a probability. (Yuanfangdelang (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

This sounds like original research. Can you point to articles by at least two independent authors supporting this position? Skbkekas (talk) 04:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is an original research in Statistics, especially for the piecewise regression analysis. The other current methods use an arbitrary assumption of enforced continuity to establish the methods. However, the "continuity" or "discontinuity" is random and canont be assumed. I have a paper published in the JSM 2009 proceedings but so far have no any other independent author supporting this psition. However, I deeply believe that this new concept as well as the relevant methods will be widely discussed and finally accepted by the public since it follows the principles of Statistics. So, I wish we can reach an agreement to recover the part of contents for Statistics. Thanks very much.(Yuanfangdelang (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2010 (Amercian Eastern Time))