Talk:Contesting controversies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is not intended to be a discussion forum for controversial topics in Amateur Radio Contesting. The article is intended to document what the controversies are, for historical and informational purposes. A secondary purpose of the article is to provide a place for these issues to be documented other than the primary Amateur Radio Contesting article. Please do not abuse this article by promoting your personal agenda or position on any of these issues. If you do, however, see something that is inaccurate or could be clarified, please feel free to improve the article. Also, feel free to add any other historical controversies that might be worth documenting. --Kharker 22:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request comment[edit]

Is this [1] revision NPOV or not? Proponents and opponents of contesting don't seem to agree. (same discussion as on Contesting)

Again, a partisan viewpoint that does not address the weight and serious of the complaints against contesters. Yet again this is in breach of the impartiality required by Wiki as it is written by contesters who want to present a particular viewpoint that supports, condones and maintains their stance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.51.214 (talk) 07:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Contesting controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]