Talk:Consumer behaviour/Archives/2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Flow, Relevance and Plagiarism?
The third paragraph and the last sentence of the second paragraph do not flow from the preceding text or fit with the rest of the article. Additionally, it appears to be copied verbatim from some unknown source. JohnWilliams (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC).
Untitled
Arrow's theory doesn't seem to work here -- it is "impossibility" rather than possibility, needs citation and some cleaning up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.64.36 (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
economicswebinstitute.org external link
This link:
Appears to have been added by an author connected with the website. In keeping with our guidelines I'm moving it here for consideration by non-connected editors. -- SiobhanHansa 18:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted a large part of the list of the "General Bibliography". None of these qualified in my opinion as as key-articles or books on important topics in the field of consumer behaviour. Sinas (talk) 11:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC) consumer behavior —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.36.48 (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Confusing sentence
The sentence "Consumer behaviour concern with consumer need consumer actions in the direction of satisfying needs leads to his behaviour of every individuals depend on thinking" (in the paragraph on Internal influences) doesn't make much sense. If not edited by someone who understands what it is supposed to mean, the sentence should be removed.--Maymay (talk) 00:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)