Talk:Computerra

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Mass media Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.

Untitled[edit]

My sentence about difference of "Computerra" from other computer magazines is very raw and should be reworked. Geevee 09:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cover Photo[edit]

What is the need of reuploading the cover photo? It's changing every week, you know... --Yuriy Lapitskiy 12:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

At least, it's not harmful. New uploaded cover is HiRes-image and I decided that it will be more useful for Wikipedia, won't it? Geevee (talk|contribs) 20:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure it's not harmful :) But you mentioned HiRes and thus I've got one more question. The licence section of the photo reads - "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of magazine covers

* to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question,

* with the publication name either visible on the image itself or written in the image description above."

It's probably wrong to upload high-resolution photo as "fair use", though it's not harmful either. --Yuriy Lapitskiy 20:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Just to avoid misunderstanding and close the discussion: current image is free, because permission is obtained from the author via OTRS. Ilya Voyager (talk) 16:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Computerra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202124130/http://inside.computerra.ru/ to http://inside.computerra.ru/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]