Talk:Commonwealth Railways NC class

	Australia portal Commonwealth Railways NC class is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A new page[edit]

Have added a lot of data and a pic of the loco - will find one of NC2 in "Public toilet" guise.

would appreciate someone having a go at refining it, though I do disagree with the ratings above- put up not long after I wrote this page. Given that the article is properly referenced, it smacks of the reviewer not knowing about the loco, and not being familiar with other pages in WikiSulzer55 (talk) 10:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews are generally done quickly because there are too many articles too review and not enough reviewers. That said few articles are above start class, in this case the "quality of the prose" is "distinctly unencyclopedic" (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment), in particular it is full of one sentence paragraphs. Please note there is also a "Current requests for assessment" section at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment.--Grahame (talk) 01:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then the issue is quality v quantity - is it not better to review fewer articles, give better feedback and gain an overall improvement in Wiki than to lobb irrelevant and meaningless logos without backing up that logo on pages.

In the case of this article, it calls together just about all reliable sources, references them and makes a reasonably readable article. Your logos imply it is crap! Sulzer55 (talk) 11:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody said it was crap, just that much more work is needed to make it fully compliant with WP:MOS and therfore eligible for consideration at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, which is the point of these ratings.--Grahame (talk) 01:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor tweak[edit]

Ref to NC1 still being in PBO fixed - inlcuding link to SHRC Sulzer55 (talk) 10:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]