Talk:Committed (2000 film)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

The story reads like it was copied from an official synopsis.[edit]

The story reads like it was copied from an official synopsis. Copyright violation. Kelly Denham (talk) 04:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 November 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moving, handled as an uncontroversial request (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 05:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Committed (2000 film) → Committed (film) – This is the only film with this name having an article on Wikipedia. Until one of the redlinks on the disambiguation page becomes blue, the year is unnecessary for disambiguation. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but you could have just moved it yourself. There's no reason go to through an RM for uncontroversial housekeeping. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.