Talk:Combination printing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Examples[edit]

This article is crying out for some examples of work. Anyone done any original ones they can upload themselves? Also how about a step by step approach? Tyhopho 18:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will add some examples shortly Doogie57 (talk) 10:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added an example. I think it should be lower down the page under the older examples. Sorry I am not very experienced at this. Doogie57 (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These were later removed despite my ownership of the copyright which in had signed over as it was thought I was 'Promoting your own website and/or your work on Wikipedia is covered' Doogie57 (talk) 13:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

‘Multiple Printing’[edit]

In the UK this was the commonly used term for ‘Combination Printing’

certainly from the late 1960’s when I became aware and began using the process. I shall add as references some Photo Magazine articles entitled as such which have examples and some step by step approaches. Doogie57 (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Process re 'Combining negatives’[edit]

In the Process section it appears to state that the result is a combined negative. This can be achieved but as described you would end up with a positive image on film. (Unless you were exposing on Kodak Duplicating Film in which case you would have a duplicate negative). This process is used to expose a Photographic Print from a number of separate negatives thus retaining the original quality of the original negatives.

This should be made much clearer.

Doogie57 (talk) 10:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]