Talk:Cogobuy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"DGG" believed this to be a neutral point of view The Banner talk has a personal connection to this company going back over a year, request a third opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyCarter87 (talkcontribs) 22:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that you accuse me of having a personal connection with this company while on your talk page somebody else is mentions you as paid editor. And your accusation of cyberbullying the article is funny. The Banner talk 23:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ow, the article is just 7 months old and written by the company "Senior Management Consultant". If I have something with the article, that will be a severe allergy for promo and advertising. The Banner talk 23:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Agreed request for impartial review AmyCarter87 (talkcontribs) 22:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Regardless The Banner talk clearly has a personal connection and cannot be impartial.

Full disclosure I was not paid to edit the Cogobuy page and have no relationship to the company, The Banner talk and a personal friend of mine got into a nasty argument on Wikipedia and asked me to rewrite the article in a neutral point of view. All my research comes from the Internet and is well sourced, I was not provided with any information from the company. AmyCarter87 (talkcontribs

Advertising[edit]

I have added an advertising tag. To my the article is advertising due to the adding of about every detail, relevant or non-relevant. The Banner talk 08:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that a lot of the earlier content was not concise and talked about non-relevant details. I reworded the section about E-Commerce Platform to reflect the fact it quickly grew to become one of the largest mediums for electronic component distribution in China, as opposed to being promotional material about a service offering. I had removed the advertising tag before seeing this discussion, however still think the edit resolved the issues flagged. Happy to discuss further. Redwards21 (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]