Talk:Coast Guard One

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States: Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Comments[edit]

Any Coast Guard aircraft carrying the Vice President is designated Coast Guard Two.

"Is" or "would be"? Has this callsign ever been used? Cribcage 21:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Coast guard flag.gif[edit]

Image:Coast guard flag.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undue[edit]

How does this article give undue weight to anything? Ryan Vesey 19:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It gives undue weight to a single incident, namely Biden's use of the chopper. Why does one guy using a chopper one time for a not-particularly-notable flight merit an entire article p b p 19:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because that is what made the plane Coast Guard Two. The article is essentially about the flight. If you get consensus for your desired merge, then it's a nonissue, if there isn't consensus for the merge, then the material certainly belongs. It seems to me that you are attempting to add tags to get your way in the discussion. On another note, how you can find a Chili burger to be more notable than Coast Guard One/Two is beyond me. Ryan Vesey 19:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]