Talk:Coal Harbour

City definition vs Historical definition again

The "Coal Harbour Neighbourhood" is a planner's fiction and a political invention; the old Blueblood Alley on West Pender was always considered part of the West End; and while the Marine Building overlooks Coal Harbour, it's not part of Coal Harbour. A distinction has to be made in this article between the historical Coal Harbour, ie. other than as a body of water but as a commercial/industrial and only barely residential district, and the city's new post-gee-aren't-we-great definition/redevelopment of all the CPR and other fill on the south flank of the Harbour (which has filled in the harbour, not incidentally); same problem as with the city's definition of the West End vs the historical reality and the way people use the term. I don't buy for a minute that the Bentall Centre or "the Melville" (yawn; do we really need condo developments to have their own wiki-promotion pages?) are in Coal Harbour, or that so many of the so many tallest buildings are in the supposed Coal Harbour Neighbourhood. Screw city hall - they're downtown, and that's it; a mention could be made that the city has "branded" this area to be Coal Harbour, but in local parlance it remains "Downtown" and/or the Financial District; Coal Harbour as a neighbourhood, residential that is, is brand-new and, to me, is entirely north of Hastings Street.Skookum1 17:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:AGF --Usgnus 17:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

So we have a modern definition in popular and growing use that's contrary to the historical definition. Big deal. We should report them both. Cite each from reliable sources so they're verifiable. Readers can take it from there. --Ds13 19:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Coal Harbour has always been a neighbourhood--just never listed in the maps. It had the kanaka cherry orchard, Spratt's Oilery, squatters on Deadmans, float homes, boats acting as homes, Brockton Point Neighbourhood, Lightstation, bums in Stanley Park, rooming houses, Blueblood alley you mention, barracks, Rowing Club as houses, and the Stuart Blg. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Article name

I'm thinking that the page should be moved to Coal Harbour, Vancouver (or something similar) and a disambiguation page created at Coal Harbour. (Seems a trifle unfair to the folks in the village of Coal Harbour to co-opt the main name... plus it would bring the title in line with the naming convention for the Vancouver project.) --Ckatz 05:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually Coal Harbour (Vancouver) is my preference, like Killarney (Vancouver) and all the lakes at Category:Lakes of British Columbia and most rivers at Category:Rivers of British Columbia. --Usgnus 06:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Fine with me, and thanks for the input - I wasn't sure what the specifics were for a body of water. There are quite a few links that would need updating, but I'm more than willing to do the work as it was my suggestion. How long should we wait to see if anyone is opposed - a few days, a week, what do you think? --Ckatz 06:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Point of information: Coal Harbour in Vancouver was named first (by George Vancouver) - I think; it may be that he'd also named the one on the Island, but I'm not familiar enough with the logs of his voyages to know which place he'd charted first. My impression, loosely, is that the community on the island and the bay with that name there were from a later exploration of the island, when coal seams were actively being looked for; and I'm not sure if that particular stretch of coast was charted by Vancouver or his Spanish colleagues (they traded and amalgamated charts).Skookum1 07:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Floating Homes

There are several floating homes at Granville Island. Aren't they legal, too?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coal Harbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006134022/http://www.millbistro.ca/events/Coal_Harbour_History/coal_harbour_history.html to http://www.millbistro.ca/events/Coal_Harbour_History/coal_harbour_history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)