Talk:CoRoT-1b

Corot-exo-1b or Corot-Exo-1b?[edit]

This is a minor issue, but still: The ESA news release clearly designated this planet as Corot-Exo-1b, not Corot-exo-1b. Should we not follow that? Awolf002 11:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The BBC report that was the original reference had Corot-exo-1b. But the press statement is the definitive source. There are also likely to be a lot more, dozens or hundreds. I'd assume they'll go on using the same designation. --GwydionM 13:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the text to use Exo instead of exo. Should we also rename the article, itself? I think we could request a move to get input by the community. Awolf002 11:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logical to move. Maybe you should move it on the 10th, if no one objects first. --GwydionM 12:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia uses the form CoRoT-Exo-1 b[1] and the original press release Corot-Exo-1b[2]. I think the press release should be considered more authoritative. When the discovery paper someday comes out, we should stick on the form used in it. — JyriL ^talk 19:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on COROT-1b. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20100118162658/http://listes.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/wws/arc/exoplanets/2009-03/msg00003.html to http://listes.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/wws/arc/exoplanets/2009-03/msg00003.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]