Talk:Climate of Alaska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should there be a reference for the almost-plaguerized second paragraph? -mercer5089

Anchorage's climate is subarctic (Dfc) due to it's short, cool summers, according to article. This is only partially true, as that explanation also applies to the oceanic sub Arctic Cfc climate. Anchorage, in addition, has a colder winter with at least one month colder than -3 Centigrades (24-hr average). Orcaborealis (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Climate of Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Climate of Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Level of Precision[edit]

Reference the discussion below on the User_talk:Jasper_Deng on the level of precision needed when converting Fahrenheit to Celsius, can someone please give a third opinion on this discussion with reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Units_of_measurement unit conversion

Hello Jasper Deng. I see you changed my edit of Climate of Alaska "while in the winter, the temperature can fall below −50 °F (−45.6 °C)" The Fahrenheit temperature is rounded to the nearest 10°F, it's not an exact temperature, if it were exact it would perhaps read 50.5°F, We are talking about the whole state of Alaska here, therefore why the unnecessary precision for the conversion? Avi8tor (talk) 06:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
   The key word is “below” but not with your reasoning. It’s not a supremum of a set of measurements and thus not subject to measurement error.—Jasper Deng (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

I'd also point out the following from the Manual of Style "Whenever a conversion is used, ensure that the precision of the converted quantity in the article is comparable to the precision of the value given by the source (see § Unit conversions)". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Units_of_measurement Avi8tor (talk) 07:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

   And there is no talk of “precision” here because we are not talking about measurements. Thus that is not applicable.—Jasper Deng (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
       A temperature is a measurement ! If you look further down the page you'll see the record minimum and maximum temperatures, they are way colder than this. Here we have the temperature can fall below xx. The xx°F has no decimal place therefore by the manual of Style the conversion should have no decimal. If it states the temperature is in the 90's, that's a difference of 10°F or 5°C. Avi8tor (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
           No. Temperature is a thermodynamic state variable, independent of any measurements. This is an exact conversion, we do not need to needlessly drop the precision. Your only option is to get a third opinion because you clearly do not understand what a measurement is, versus an exact cutoff.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Avi8tor (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]