Talk:Clathrate hydrate

Oceans Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

Lets merge some pages[edit]

I would suggest merging this page with the one called Gas hydrate. This one is fundamental and the other is more technical. Frankly speaking, this page is much better since the other contains some wrong information. Therefore, the suggestion is to keep this article and add the usefull stuff from the other one. I’ll start working on that but haven’t gotten much time at the moment.
GGenov 11:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet idea. That would bring some order in the present situation. In this place I would also kindly ask all USGS members working in this field to put true credits under not their pictures (Not giving credits to Goettingen group, which had happened in "Natural_Gas_Hydrates" topic, was not kind and totally not scholar). The wrong credits are corrected but still we would like to avoid such situations in the future.
AFalenty 18:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion[edit]

In the following text from the article, in what way(s) is CH₄ a more efficient greenhouse gas than CO₂?

Catastrophic release of methane from the decomposition of such deposits may lead to a global climate change, since CH₄ is more efficient greenhouse gas even than CO₂.

I think this should be clarified in the article.
Jgrunschel 06:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, you are probably right. I just fixed a lnk/reference to the Methane page, where this is explained more precisely and in sufficient details. I didn't try to clarify more here since this had alredy been done there.
GGenov 17:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Formation and evolution?[edit]

There is a link to this page at the bottom of the article but there doesn't appear to be a connection to it in the text. Is this really related to clathrate hydrates or does this link not belong on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Branigan22 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as a fuel[edit]

any information about using this as a fuel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.62.179 (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clathrate hydrate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weird style of sourcing[edit]

I see a lot of examples in this page of sourcing info by writing something like, "John Doe et al. found that ...", which seems out of place for Wikipedia pages. I'm not very versed in Wikipedia editing though, so this may just be my opinion. Any thoughts? MatthewJenkins02 (talk) 00:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]