Talk:Civil wrong
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Does anyone else think this page is extremely poorly written? for one, I think people generally know that right and wrong are complementary terms. Does that need to be said? beyond that, I can barely figure out what it's trying to say at points, particularly the sentence beginning with "A statement that an act complained of." 75.187.48.113 (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)drzank
- "I think people generally know that right and wrong are complementary terms. Does that need to be said?" It isn't said for own sake. It is offered as the explanation for another proposition (namely that, a wrong is said to involve the violation of a right).
- As for the sentence beginning with "A statement that an act complained of", if you can think of another way of expressing the explanation of the term "legally wrongful", given in Rogers v Rajendro Dutt, which is included in the footnote, by all means say so. James500 (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)