Talk:Civil recovery

,

Untitled

what can you tell me about civil recovery? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.188.45.53 (talk • contribs)

Civil recovery demands

I don't see why another article is needed for the same topic. They should be merged. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

possibly, but I did the first step, divided into sections to make the different legal systems distinct. Merged or not , what I remain concerned with is NPOV and undue emphasis. This was clearly written for the purposes of advocacy. Whether I might agree with the advocacy is irrelevant. DGG ( talk ) 21:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

I think Wikipedia should be concerned with telling the whole truth about Civil Recovery and Civil Demand which would probably be found "unconstitutional" if these civil demand laws were ever tested in the highest courts. These laws are fiscally expedient for the retailers and the state and the local bar associations but the definition of "stealing" in the law had to be changed and manipulated in order to treat shoplifting as the "completed" offense of larceny. These laws are really a legalized form of extortion but efficient in controlling the "dishonest" masses, apparently. It would be possible to stop almost all shoplifting at checkout with the technology that is now available but, of course, why would you want to do this when the current system is so lucrative? Hey! when the arrest or stop is made under the authority of a city-licensed security guard and you can get your merchandise back and $200 more ----why not encourage "stealing" in the interests of your bottom line.

Clean up

I've attempted to expand, cite and generally clean up the article. The article could perhaps do with some information on other common law jurisdictions (Canada, Aus, NZ etc) and any civil jurisdictions were this exists. I've also merged this and the Civil Recovery Demand page as per the brief conversation above. Sotakeit (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil recovery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018024924/http://www.attorneygeneral.org:80/shoplift.html to http://www.attorneygeneral.org/shoplift.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)