Talk:Civil War: Young Avengers/Runaways

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Production History[edit]

I think there is sufficent info in the article to create a "Production history" section above the "Plot" section, but I'm have a hard time breaking up the info. Anybody got any ideas? JQF 23:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly? There isn't much information that ISN'T production history. Majin Gojira 16:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. It looks alot more solid now. JQF 22:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speed in Civil War #2[edit]

Did I miss it or did anyone see Speed (Thomas Sheppard) being taken away by the SHIELD agents in CW2?

It is safe to assume that Tommy was with the rest of the YA when they joined the resistance. However, it is mots likely that he was not shown explicity because it would spoil his costume from the final issue, which only came out a few days before that issue of Civil War. Also, this is for the CW article, not the YA/R article Mishy dishy 15:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

I'm curious as to why that bit is there from the Illuminati. Didn't what Iron Man said happen with the New Warriors. He was saying that some team was going to cause the SHRA to go forward cause they screw up and wouldn't that have been the New Warriors and not the Runaways or Young Avengers.

Well, that bit expicitly mentions both the Young Avengers and the Runaways; and I don't believe that the actual act is through properly yet, it's just been propelled forward due to the New Warriors. 80.176.4.125 02:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It uses them as examples. Nothing more than examples. Does the wrod 'might' or 'maybe' ring a bell? THe actual act is through, or have you not read Civil War # 2? Mishy dishy 21:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:YNGAVNRUNWY Left col.jpg[edit]

Image:YNGAVNRUNWY Left col.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]