Talk:City rights in the Low Countries

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Citylist, chronical

nl:Gebruiker:GeeKaa

Low Countries of Netherlands?[edit]

Shouldn't the introduction speak about (and link to) the Netherlands instead of the Low Countries. The entire list of cities seems to cover cities from the modern state only and none in Belgium, Luxembourg, France or Germany (all lying in part or integrally withing the Low Countries). I first considered changing the intro, but I ain't entirely certain yet. I can if needed try to look up dates and details concerning cityrights within the territory of the old duchy of Luxembourg. I possibly have similar material concerning other cities in the area as well.

Lastly, this article doesn't cite any sources, some of the information is also in contradiction to data I have, certainly parts are interpretation (erecting and guarding city walls is not just in the interest of the burghers, the nobility, if it can maintain command (unlike for instance the archbishop of Cologne) of important parts of those fortifications gains a lot too). Also, from examples within the old Luxembourgish (dynasty) counties I know that many old privileges were only confirmed by gifting city rights. It also usually led to unified codes of laws and particularly taxation (the city rights of Luxembourg for instance actually lower theoretical taxation, in fact though it lead to increased taxation over time). In many cases benefits were mutual (upper nobility/clergy and burghers).--Caranorn 23:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I couln't link an article to 'city rights' (which redirects to 'Town privileges' and under See also mentions 'City rights in the Netherlands'. To my surprise, this article does not handle the historical Netherlands, the Low Countries. City rights were mainly granted in medieval times till the Seventeen Provinces and there cannot be made a sensible distinction between the Benelux countries in this respect.
I can only move the article to 'City rights in the Low Countries', and make a chapter for the (present-day) Netherlands. It still needs a proper rewrite and of course a section on Belgium (e.g. Genk obtained city rights only recently) and one on Luxembourg. — SomeHuman 15 Mar 2007 03:00 (UTC)

I had almost forgotten about this article. As I said before I can try to add a list of city rights per date for the old duchy of Luxembourg (most in modern day Belgium) as I probably have that data. Possibly also on some Belgian cities outside this immediate sphere.--Caranorn 13:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the current article is more of a list of city rights in the Netherlands. Either rename (as suggested) or add the other low countries (I have no knowledge of these, but agree should be done).Arnoutf 19:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question on city rights[edit]

Weren't the city rights of the Ancien Régime abolished by the French and replaced with a "city title" at one point?--Ganchelkas 13:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rights versus law[edit]

Shouldn't this article speak more extensively about judiciary rights, widely considered the essence of city rights? Cf. the introductory paragraph of the Dutch version. [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.208.78.25 (talk) 08:37, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City rights in the Low Countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161021113120/http://www.stadsrechten.nl/ to http://www.stadsrechten.nl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]