Talk:City of Ten Thousand Buddhas

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First Monastery[edit]

Please, everyone - the first Chan Monastery in the United States is actually Gold Mountain Monastery in San Francisco - also founded by the Master Hsuan Hua and under the Dharma Realm Buddhist Association. The City of Ten Thousand Buddhas is the biggest and largest Buddhist monastery in the Western Hemisphere. Kungming2 05:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Cult"[edit]

Recent additions to this page have tried to describe it as a "cult", and to paint its practices in dark ways.

All information should be reliably sourced, and that becomes particularly important when it comes to negative claims against a person or body of persons. I am undoing the recent additions (again), and the material should not be readded until it is sourced. Particularly with the "cult" descriptor, we would need a very unbiased and topically-respected source to put that into Wikipedia's voice, although we can state that thus-and-such-a-group designate it a "cult" with a bit less rigor. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]