Talk:Church Women United

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reassessment[edit]

I've assessed this article as C class for the following reasons:

  • It covers the topic fairly well, however,
  • It lacks reliable sources
  • The language reads as if it is straight off the CWU's website (in other words it sounds promotional,)
  • I made some edits to fix some of the promotional language and some style issues

To progress, reliable 3rd party sources will be needed and the language is going to have to become more neutral. Ltwin (talk) 21:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Records?[edit]

I thought it might be appropriate to provide a reference/link to the Records of the Church Women United in the Saint Paul Area , but not sure it fits this article. Thoughts? Archivist100 (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged[edit]

Sources are WP:PRIMARY and WP:SELFPUB, including the cache of papers by Helen McAllister. Google News indicates nothing but an obituary; Google Books turns up two self-published books and no other significant coverage by third-party sources to establish notability. Elizium23 (talk) 02:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Church Women United. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]