Talk:Christina piercing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Body Modification, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Body ModificationWikipedia:WikiProject Body ModificationTemplate:WikiProject Body ModificationBody Modification articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

Type of barbell[edit]

Picture shown is post healing on a good piercing. Area should be shaved before piercing...Also I recommend a straight barbell be the correct length and bent to fit individual, as all womens anatomy and shapes are different. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.40.74.88 (talk • contribs) .

I hear that in fact, straight barbell induce a higher risk of rejection and that surface barbells are preferable. The image shows a surface barbell. Rama 23:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a how to guide. Though sometimes I wish it would link to sister sites like wiki how or wiktionary. Most have similar aims (educating the public, presumably) with a slightly different methodology. Oh well. That damn Cabal and their "Project"... 92.0.150.111 (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion relating to previous picture[edit]

Ew. can we get a better picture? one that's more attractive? ~_^ 24.5.125.232 05:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attractiveness is not relevant reason to get a better picture - I think most genital piercing images should have shaved/trimmed pubic hair, if it makes the placement difficult to see, but right now this image is all we've got. You're more than welcome to submit one of your own Christina piercing, or take an image of a "more attractive" one and post it to Wikipedia if you'd like. Glowimperial 17:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is 'ew' about it? Pubic hair is perfectly natural, NOT having any pubic hair is unnatural.And who is to define what is or is not attractive anyway? -Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.57.146 (talk • contribs)

You're kidding, right? Pubic hair may be natural, but it also traps bacteria. Why would you pierce something and let it turn into a swamp? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.153.38 (talk • contribs)

How long have humans had pubic hair? Millions of years? And you're worried about a little external bacteria. Shaving introduces small quantities of bacteria and viruses into the bloodstream with every scrape or cut. Silly person. Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.156.73 (talk • contribs)

How long have humans had genital piercings? Tens of years? Of course people are worried about a little external bacteria. Don't assume that shaving causes scrapes or cuts, also there is the option of laser hair removal or waxing. Silly person. 49.176.69.244 (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

x tina[edit]

did it get its name from aguilera?or was it before her time? 210.9.15.116 16:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

before her time. Glowimperial 16:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]