Talk:Chinese People's Liberation Army Forces Hong Kong Building

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (996)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,344) • Stub-Class articles (6,667)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (398) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,247)

Military history: Asian / Chinese B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Page title[edit]

It was noted that this article takes the name of a former name instead of its current name. Is there any special reason for this before a rename is made?--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 12:23 (UTC)

Prince of Wales Building is the common name. — Insta ntnood July 6, 2005 12:57 (UTC)

There is a major difference between using names of common uage in wikipedia and using outdated names. I would have tought this is elementary?--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 13:06 (UTC)

I do not oppose moving this article according to the current name of the building. But it is a fact "Prince of Wales Building" is the name popularly known among Hongkongers, at least until the present moment. It'd be nice to hear about the comment from other Hong Kong wikipedians. — Insta ntnood July 6, 2005 13:25 (UTC)

Yes, and you are repeating your point which I have already said makes no sense. I suppose the likes of you will be insisting that Beijing continue to be known as Peking despite the official change in name? Could you find us any other building article we have here which uses an old name instead of its current name? It will be interesting to find any such article!--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 13:58 (UTC)

Take a look at the interwiki links of the Beijing article and see how many European languages are still calling it Peking or other similar spellings. ;-) — Insta ntnood July 6, 2005 14:56 (UTC)

For your information, Peking is still an official and current English name for many Beijing institutions, so that hardly counts. See Peking University, and its official website [1]. If nothing more convincing could be said, the move will be made.--Huaiwei 05:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chinese People's Liberation Army Forces Hong Kong Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217184612/http://www.pongu-travel.com/hongkong/index.php?id=ChinesePeoples to http://www.pongu-travel.com/hongkong/index.php?id=ChinesePeoples

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]