Talk:China national chess team results

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indiscriminate collection of information[edit]

Per WP:IINFO, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Whilst there may be some encyclopedic information within the tables, the vast majority of the information is not encyclopedic.

The main editor of the page is showning signs of WP:OWNership, unilaterally removing tags which refer to his/her editing Mayalld (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are highly discriminate in selection. What are the signs of ownership? I welcome anybody to improve these articles. In my opinion you are not improving them. Gollenaiven (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, as we cannot agree, the correct course is to leave the tags in place, and wait for somebody else to offer an opinion. Mayalld (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


No, the best way is for you to voice your specific complaints here so improvements can be made. Gollenaiven (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on China national chess team results. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]