Talk:Chemmeen

A fact from Chemmeen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Chemmeen', a popular Malayalam novel, was made into a colour Cinemascope film, one of the first in Malayalam film industry?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/January.

Wikipedia

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Kerala / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Colour movie[edit]

>> Incidentally, it was also the first Malayalam movie in colour.

It is not the first Malayalam colour movie. Kandam bacha kottu in 1961 was the first M movie to have sequences in colour (like Mughal-e-Azam). Chemmeen may be the first full length colour movie, but we need a more solid reference to confirm that. Tintin Talk 19:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right. Though "Chemmeen" and "Colour" in Google give lot of links saying that Chemmeen is the first Malayalam Color movie, this article in The Hindu suggests that it was one of the earliest colour films made in cinemascope in Malayalam. OK then, give me another fact asap for listing it on DYK ;-) --Gurubrahma 20:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have to pass the buck to Pournami. I have no books with me to refer or confirm. Tintin Talk 21:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you search for "kandam bacha" in google, it comes up with three or four links like [1] and [2] which says that it was the first full length colour movie. I am more confused now ! Tintin Talk 22:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chemmeen was not first colour movie in malayalam; it was kandam bacha coat-1961; 4 years before it. "one of the first" seems ok; whether it was first cinemascope in M i don't really know. -Pournami 17:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late note, everyone! I recall reading on another Wikipedia article that the first Malayalam color movie was called Balan. Then again, I don't know whether that was a full-length color movie, either! In any case, the fact that this movie was one of the first full-length color movies seems to have been a major selling point for Chemmeen. Of course, the fact that the original novel was already somewhat popular didn't hurt! --Kuaichik 02:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balan was the first talkie. It was in B&W (and made in 1938). The other page is wrong. Tintin 05:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separation of Article[edit]

The article need to be separated. The novel and film need to have different pages. I think the contents of this page can stay, while the film page can have produation, cast, crew and reception details, adding of which here may be unsuitable--Anoopkn (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemmeen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6W5lwHhfU?url=http://web.archive.org/web/20150204142913/http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mayabazar-is-indias-greatest-film-ever-ibnlive-poll/391184-8-66.html to http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mayabazar-is-indias-greatest-film-ever-ibnlive-poll/391184-8-66.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]