Talk:Cheerappanchira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheerappanchira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Origin - Dispute[edit]

As per the recent addition ,[1] The origin of this family is changed to Kadathanad which is solely interpreted from certain vedio references in non english language . However whole of the the main written sources which are published by the same media houses and others do not even mention this anywhere. This is violation of WP:VIDEOLINK and WP: Verfiability Preferring alleged interpreted , content or claim from multiple non- english vedio sources , while the written and verifyable do not support this . Interestingly the alleged content was added and was removed multiple times due tonlack of a relaible source (even one ) . Bilgiljilll (talk) 09:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

points : The alleged content added is not present in any (atleast one ) written sources, the sources by the same media houses also have COMPLETELY avoided the alleged conversations . Multiple vedios are required to verify(wheather possible or not) the claims and interpretations . Regarding the vedio(in non english language), claim that different words are said during certain timelines (one at this timeline and one at another timeline in another vedio, as per you said ) , so can that proves the entire interpretation (3 paragraphs) which is completely absent in all sources (my main concern is relaibility) ?? WP:VIDEOLINK clearly states if it is solely available only online in a youtube video(as per you claim) where there is no formally written edvidence , it is inappropriate . I throughly did check the all of the written sources by the 'same media house' and it is not even(or anything related to the claim) are present there. My question is ,this is regarding the history of the family (as per the addition) and why this is completely absent in all those sources???, that too published by the same media houses  ??? Also i wonder how non english youtube vedio interpretations are entirely preffered for the whole arguement, when multiple written english sources are available , (i)that too to make changes regarding the 'history' or origins, (ii)that too when this is completely absent in sources published by the same publishers (both) and in all other sources .Interestingly the same claim was removed by multiple editors starting from Dec 2016 onwards. (can check the references and sources) WP:Verifiability WP:VIDEOLINK. Bilgiljilll (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Verifiable written sources other than regional youtube vedio. Also the same news house published written sources where the link to kadathanad is nowhere mentioned.
Bilgiljilll (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Joshua Jonathan , plenty of english sources are available here (mentioned already ) where as noone of them (even one) mentions or supports the claim related to this origin theory . What do u think with regards to WP:VIDEOLINK and WP:Verifiability ? link to this page is added in multiple pages such as kalarippayattu ,kalari etc . Bilgiljilll (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those videos are not RS, and the NIE-article is questionable too. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheerappanchira&oldid=1200813969"