Talk:Chausses

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pronuncuation[edit]

I would be very surprised to discover the given pronunciation is correct. Is there a reference to establish that it's pronounced any differently than it would be in French? TCC (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Not the greatest source, so remove if you object. Durova 03:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not as far as I can tell. Here is a glossary of old weapon and armor terms in French. "Chausse" has no accent. (Added: this seems to be distinct from the adjective "chaussé" meaning "shod" and the heraldic term meaning "shoe".) But I'll look it up later in the OED; it ought to be in there. TCC (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry; the above is based on your original reply. I'll still hold off on changing it until I can find something definitive. TCC (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a point. I added the pronunciation uncritically since both French and English tended to mangle their early loan words. Thanks for taking an interest and please correct me if I'm mistaken. Durova 04:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, the OED (original version, compact edition) gives the word only in the plural, chausses. I suppose correctly used it's more like "pants"; one can of course speak of a single "pant" -- which I suspect is a back-formation -- but it's not normal. Chausses then. It gives two different pronunciations. It was "originally naturalized" as [ˈtʃaʊsɛz] which is pretty much what I'd expect for an older French loanword. (That's "ch" as in "choose", "au" pronounced as the "ou" in "loud", and a regular short "e" as in "estate".) But it also says that it's now more often pronounced as the modern French [ʃos]. (This was the late 19th-early 20th century though, so I would guess the French pronunciation now predominates.)
This is the problem with words you see written all the time but never acutally say, isn't it? TCC (talk)
By the way, since Chausse->Chausses requires a page move, I'll leave it up to someone who's been working on the article. Personally, I hate it when I've been working on something and someone else just barges in and rearranges everything. TCC (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It had been a few days, so I just went ahead and did it. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bayeux Tapestry[edit]

Does it indeed show knights wearing chausses? It looks to me more like hose underneath hauberks. TCC (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, as the picture is to early for proper chausses anyway. I'm going to remove the pic. Master z0b (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image caption[edit]

I don't think that image actually illustrates poleyns, rather it is most likely padded cuisses over the chausses. I'm going to remove that reference. Master z0b (talk) 04:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chausses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]