Talk:Charlie Banacos

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Jazz Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflict of interest[edit]

As a former student of Mr. Banacos, I don't notice anything that disputes what I experienced or learned. In all wikidom, there's a distinction to be made between conflict of interest and bias.

I'm glad to see CB in Wikipedia. He was one of the most extraordinary, talented, caring, helpful, insightful and amusing teachers, of any subject, I've ever had. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.235.177.119 (talk) 15:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the article slightly and removed the conflict of interest banner, as it is no longer a major issue in my view, although it clearly was in the past when another editor put the banner there. Having said that, the article still has a tone that makes it sound rather like an advertisement for him, whether that was intentional or not. In its current state it actually does him a disservice. It's not really a biography. Where was he born? Where did he train? Who were his teachers? What about his career as performer (apart from simply listing the people he's performed with)? etc. etc. The article also has original research, attributing things to what was allegedly heard or experienced in his courses. They may well be true, but what the article needs are published, independent sources that say that. At the very minimum, some of his ideas and techniques should be attributed to his published work, complete with page number. He is mentioned in a lot of books [1] unfortunately, previews aren't available online for many of the key ones. I would suggest that anyone wanting to really improve the article further, go to a library and source the article more reliably. Voceditenore (talk) 16:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie Banacos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119020321/http://www.newenglandconservatory.edu:80/faculty/banacosC.html to http://www.newenglandconservatory.edu/faculty/banacosC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]