Talk:Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 16:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Llewee, I will be reviewing this article. I will hopefully be done with the review by the end of this week. Aintabli (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): The lead is of appropriate length and doesn't get into excessive detail. The layout looks good. I haven't noticed any questionable terms.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section): Yes.
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Although Charles Edward had ties to the Nazis, I didn't notice any statement that could come out as not neutral.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: No disruptive edits since the article's nomination.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Images[edit]

  • The first image, used within the infobox, [1] seems to not be in the public domain as it is not listed so by the person who published it on Flickr [2].
  • This [3] may as well be problematic per the copyright policy of the Royal Collection Trust at [4], which implies that it is not within the public domain.
  • I'm not sure if the documented copyright for [5] on Wikimedia Commons is truthful.

You may correct me if I am mistaken, though. Since pictures are plentiful in this article, these could be removed instead of a replacement. Llewee, ping me when done. Aintabli (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I don't often add photographs from third party sources to the commons myself and am not really a authority on copyright. I've changed the three images in question.--Llewee (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 15:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

  • Needs page number: "Burke's Genealogical and Heraldic History of Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage". Burke's Peerage Limited. 31 December 1885. Retrieved 2017-12-31 – via Google Books.
I would also change the url to https://books.google.com/books?id=eA84XBiBeroC&pg=PApage number (Example: https://books.google.com/books?id=eA84XBiBeroC&pg=PA6) and maybe change the access date along the way.
Also, there's a duplicate of this reference. (The other links to a Google Docs.)
  • This may not be reliable: Barger, Brittani (2016). "Princess Sibylla of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha – Duchess of Västerbotten". historyofroyalwomen.com. History of Royal Women. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  • Needs page number: Lars Elgklou (Swedish): Bernadotte. Historien - och historier - om en familj (English: "Bernadotte. The history - and stories - of a family") Askild & Kärnekull Förlag AB, Stockholm 1978. ISBN 91-7008-882-9.[page needed]
  • Needs page number: "Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918–1945, from the Archives of the German Foreign Ministry". U.S. Government Printing Office. 31 December 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2017 – via Google Books.
  • Many sources lack page numbers. It may be good to check each of them, and if they are readily accessible on Google Books, add the page number, if not, remove them and the sentence they are supposed to back up, unless it is something indispensable. There may also be some duplicate references I have not mentioned here. Aintabli (talk) 04:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Several non-RS remain including historyofroyalwomen.com and many book sources lack page numbers. These issues need to be solved for this article to pass a future review. Aintabli (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]