A fact from Chappell–Ganguly controversy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
Is it just me, or is this topic not worth having a separate artcile for? It reads like an irate Indian cricket follower extensively rehashing a personality clash between a player and his team's coach. There have been literally thousands of these in the history of professional sport.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.160.162 (talk • contribs)
Yes, it passes WP:N, and was highly notable. Do you think I am a Ganguly or Chappell supporter? I'm the author. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
