Talk:Cha 110913−773444

Luminosity[edit]

In the paper I got the values for luminosity from, they wrote Log L/L_☉ = -3.22. I wasn't sure whether Log was the natural log or Log₁₀, but the value I supplied (0.04) came from assuming they meant the natural log. If Log₁₀ was meant, then it should instead read 6 x 10^-4 L_☉. Benhocking 17:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely log to base ten. Natural (base e) log would have been denoted ln. This was fixed in the article years ago. Modest Genius ^talk 23:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest[edit]

Since Cha 110913-773444 is NOT a brown dwarf according to this article, OTS 44 should still be the smallest (better:lightest) brown dwarf known, shouldn't it? --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protoplanetary disk[edit]

Does anyone know how big this object's protoplanetary disk is? --JorisvS (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is that possible?[edit]

How is it possible to discover a Jupiter-size planet left in space, not illuminated by any sun? Does it radiate anything detectable? Thank you. - 92.100.170.169 (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way: the link to the page at exoplanet.eu is broken. The NASA link, however, is working, and they appear to say it was actually a dark star by its physics, unless I am mistaken... - 92.100.170.169 (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-brown dwarfs can be detected by Infrared / thermal radiation. -- Kheider (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - 89.110.12.84 (talk) 19:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cha 110913-773444. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080613202416/http://exoplanet.eu:80/Cha110913.html to http://exoplanet.eu/Cha110913.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]