Talk:Cerro Castillo Formation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cerro Castillo Formation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Cerro Castillo Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paleobiota help[edit]

Code[edit]

This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.

Premade rowspans:

| rowspan="2" |

| rowspan="3" |

| rowspan="4" |

| rowspan="5" |

| rowspan="6" |

| rowspan="7" |

Replacement headings for "Presence" column

! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material

Replacement headings for "Taxa" column

Cell background colors[edit]

The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.

Color key

Taxon	Reclassified taxon	Taxon falsely reported as present	Dubious taxon or junior synonym	Ichnotaxon	Ootaxon	Morphotaxon

Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; ~~crossed out~~ taxa are discredited.

Red for reclassified and preoccupied

|style="background:#fbdddb;" |

Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:

|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |

Dark grey for discredited taxa:

|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |

Peach for Ichnotaxa:

|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |

Light blue for Ootaxa:

|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |

Light green for Morphotaxa:

|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |

Doubts about this formation[edit]

I didn't find conclusive evidence for this formation, especially not dated to the Jurassic. Searching in Spanish gives 2 results, one is the Spanish article about Megalosaurus, where it is said "Albian to Cenomanian" of Chubut. The second result is about a Cerro Castillo Formation of Oligocene age in Tierra del Fuego (so not Chubut), pages 46-48. Fossilworks doesn't list this formation, so also not the Megalosaurus fossils found here, which is not a South American genus at all. @Mikenorton:, any ideas? Tisquesusa (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of articles on formations were started based on Weichsampel alone. It's a huge compendium of data on dinosaur fossil locations, but they are sometimes out of date and occasionally erroneous as far as I can tell. That record may be based solely on the Spanish language source that you found. If that's the case, and I can't see the relevant page in Weichsampel, it's impossible to know what the current designation for this bit of stratigraphy is. In summary, I share your doubts. Mikenorton (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]