Talk:Celebrity Big Brother (British TV series) series 8

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Big Brother High‑importance

	Television portal The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Celebrity Big Brother (British TV series) series 8 has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Series 8 or Series 1?[edit]

I was just wondering if this is Series 1 or Series 8 (according to C5 website it is Series 1)? --MSalmon (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technically it's Series 1 by Channel 5, otherwise I think it's Series 8 of UK Big Brother ever done by any channel.84.92.16.13 (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mr tim111[edit]

Would "Mr tim111" stop deleting good material from this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.253.253 (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place of rumors. Also there is no point of doing duplicates and all. Mr tim111 (talk) 18:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's rumours. This is the UK edition, not USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 07:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Show and article looking good[edit]

The article is shaping up well with the template as it stands, also for the main edition. Avoid deleting factual information, add facts as they are known as the show unfolds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.253.253 (talk) 21:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the article has improved since the show went on air (which I avoided watching). The only problem I have is that is contains a few loaded terms which could be improved to bring about a more NPOV. ItsZippy (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Factual information is only useful if it's backed up with citations from reliable sources. 188.29.173.163 (talk) 00:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summary too wordy and complicated[edit]

The summary does NOT need "Big Brother said this", etc., "they met in the yard". Keep it short, stupid. The overcomplex tabulated format is not needed. Just a few brief lines per day. In general, there is no need to keep typine, "Big Brother told, BB asked". It's taken that it's BB giving the orders unless otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the summary from a table format to a written format as the table format will be refused good article status. Please do not change this back. 12bigbrother12 (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. But didn't like the table much, make sure content is not deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The regular series of the show has the summary in written text not a table --MSalmon (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK but see the summaries are short and see facts are not vandalised such as the Kerry task. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the summary does not need a wordy repetion of names, Big Brother, etc. and must be accurate. What's happened to the day 2 information about Kerry failing the task and Jedward and the bubble bath. 'she later failed' is wrong, she failed it on day 2. Get the facts right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be re-written --MSalmon (talk) 13:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to summary of events by bigbrother12[edit]

Would bigbrother12 and other stop messing up the events table and adding incorrect information? The daily summaries do not need to be wordy and must be accurate. Kerry failed the diva task on day 2, not launch night. There is also no need to keep saying the Big Brother House, big brother said this, it's taken that this is meant. Keep it short (and ACCURATE, stupid! No good altering the format if the facts are wrong.

Vandalism alert![edit]

Material and sections are being removed and moved around at will by a band of users. This is seris 1 and has its own pattern. Add facts with references but do not keep chopping it about without posting here. It was going fine till now, leave it alone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.69.140 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Puffing up Amy and Bobby[edit]

The entry on Bobby and Amy does not require a lot of puffed up info on very minor celebrities. Amy is not a star and this is not the place for a cv. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.68.53 (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All housemates in this series have their own articles, where more biographical info on each can be added. Jim Michael (talk) 17:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tasks[edit]

The brief summary of tasks allows for an at a glance state of play. The details of the tasks can then been seen in the summary. Do not remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.68.53 (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"MSalmon"[edit]

Could the above stop reverting good faith edits without consulting first? Discuss here first.

Marco Pierre White to enter house[edit]

White is to enter the house on 27 August to set a task. Just so you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.68.53 (talk) 23:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Already knew, old news.

Biographical[edit]

Stop puffing up entries for contestants with "media personality", fanzine stuff and first names. One or two lines is enough. The main details are on their own pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.68.53 (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela's Twist[edit]

Should her choices be put up in the nominations table (as done in for examle BB9 Germany)? Or should it just a note, I think it should be like it's done in BB9. --BigOz22 (talk) 21:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technically she was evicted when she made the choices and the table should be for nominating people to evcict not save. I think it should be in the notes. --MSalmon (talk) 21:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should be on the table, as with Big Brother U.S. when the evictees vote for the winner.12bigbrother12 (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but that is different as there is no public vote --MSalmon (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings links don't work[edit]

Many of the links of the ratings table are dead links and need attention. Also, it would be better for a reliable source than Inside Big Brother which is not an official site. Would be better to wait for confirmed ratins, also to add a column Day 1, etc. in BB convention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.98.14 (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Spy tweet the ratings for each show with a link, these would be more accurate than inside big brother (their twitter name is @DigitalSpy) Fatty2k10 (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed some of the sources but when the official ratings from BARB have been released then the sources can be removed --MSalmon (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal: 94.9.9.204[edit]

The above keeps reverting edits on housemates's details. Vandal alert! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.98.14 (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Information on each housemate[edit]

Do we really need all that information on the the Housemates section, all it needs is a little bit about them and the day they left the house or what place they finished (see previoous CBB articles). That is all. --MSalmon (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This can be trimmed once the show is over. I think it is informative to add this data as it shows how they have changes since coming into the house and interacted with the others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.98.14 (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

winner[edit]

should the winner ledgend etc not be yellow/gold since that was the colour for the winning tab? Chatterbox2000 (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, all BB articles have yellow in the nom table for the final --MSalmon (talk) 22:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother 1 (UK) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]