Talk:Cedar Hill, Texas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias[edit]

There seems to be a lot of biased in this article...it sounds like a visitor's bureau brochure on cedar hill. Which doesn't make much sense, because cedar hill sucks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.12.226.37 (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geography[edit]

"the highest point in a straight line from the Red River at the Texas-Oklahoma border to the Gulf Coast." Not even close. The highest point in Stephens county is over 1600' Much of NW Parker county and Palo Pinto is over 1000'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.156.165.12 (talk) 19:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Economic & Future Developments[edit]

I don't believe the economic development section, and to a degree the future development section, are on par with wikipedia's standards. Is this a wikipedia entry or a chamber of commerce commercial?

User: Coffee and TV 10:22 August 27, 2007

Well, everything I read there is true (albeit unsourced). Cedar Hill has gone from a sleepy little backwater to growing retail locations and housing at a phenomenal rate - which I think is a notable fact. I guess it's debatable whether it's all notable enough for inclusion at that level of detail - but I don't think any of it hurts in any way. Someone coming to find out about Cedar Hill might very well be interested in all of that detail. I don't think it crosses the line into being a commercial. But it really could use some references for all of those facts. SteveBaker 19:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GovtCtr1207A.jpg[edit]

Image:GovtCtr1207A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image should be deleted - I've removed it from the article. The building is close enough to completion - someone should take a free-use image of it. SteveBaker (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cedar Hill, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Cedar Hill, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cedar_Hill,_Texas&oldid=1206588189"