Talk:Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem

On 17 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cauchy–Kowalevski theorem to Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem. The result of the discussion was moved.

Explain End(V)[edit]

The statement of the theorem says that A_i is in End(V). That notation should be explained. LachlanA (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! The discussion of abstract vector spaces and endomorphisms is, in my opinion, pointless. I've replaced this by a statement in R^n or C^n. I've kept the discussion of abstract vector spaces and endomorphisms, but I've moved it later. The original page claims that theorem was valid in any vector space. I think it's only for real or complex vector spaces. Can anyone verify this? 129.215.104.124 (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relation with Cauchy problem[edit]

I'm not familiar with this topic, how does the Cauchy-Kowalevski relate to the Cauchy–Lipschitz? Don't they both address the existance of unique solution for the Cauchy problem? --Marco4math (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wrong direction?[edit]

either I am completely confused or f goes in the wrong direction: $f:W\to V$ should be there instead of $f:V\to W$

--Diogenes2000 (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link not correct?[edit]

The link to the reference Kowalevski, Sophie seems to be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.108.69.177 (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 ^(talk) 03:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cauchy–Kowalevski theorem → Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem – Appears to be more common according to Google and Google Scholar, and is in line with the article on Sofya Kovalevskaya. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 22:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.