Talk:Capilla de Guadalupe
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is this a municipality?[edit]
Other wikipedias don't know this place as a municipality of Jalisco (it would be number 126), and the list of municipalities in the official site of the state of Jalisco doesn't mention it either. The only reference given in this text is no longer valid. Personally, I doubt if the information is right. Furthermore, in the infobox the place is called a "farm, ranch", not a "municipality", but anyway it should have more than 30,000 inhabitants. A ranch of more than 30,000 inhabitants?? Could this all be just a strange joke??? ThomasPusch (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC) (editor of the Esperanto wikipedia)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Capilla de Guadalupe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070324163308/http://www.e-local.gob.mx:80/work/templates/enciclo/jalisco/mpios/14100a.htm to http://www.e-local.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/jalisco/mpios/14100a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)