Talk:Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is the plot description broken into two parts?[edit]

The plot description is unusually divided into three sections, does anyone have a good explanation for why this is? The description does not mirror the chronology or structure of the film. Unless someone can give me a good reason why it has been done this way, I'm going to reedit it into a more conventional style. Mr Subtlety (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar/wording doesn't make sense[edit]

Under the section 'Plot', this sentence does not make sense - Annie's brother is accused of the murder (since his furious public confrontation of Purcell over the subject) and one of her students starts to see the Candyman. I haven't seen the film so I cannot correct it. Is 'since' supposed to mean 'because of'?

Fair use rationale for Image:Candyman Farewell to the Flesh.jpg[edit]

Image:Candyman Farewell to the Flesh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woman has a daughter by a man who died several years earlier?[edit]

I haven't seen the movie but can't begin to understand what this means:

"Annie summons Candyman to New Orleans on the eve of Mardi Gras, where the killings begin in earnest. Her husband, Paul Mckeever, becomes one of Candyman's victims, while one of her students, Matthew, disappears. [...] Several years later, Annie has Paul's daughter, who she has named Caroline."

Is Paul a ghost who impregnates Annie? Is he a walking dead? Did he leave his sperm in a bank and she gets impregnated artificially? Did she store his sperm in her body like some primitive animals can do for a long time?

How does someone become a father several years after his own death, and that statement is made just off-handedly as if there is nothing curious to such a claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.37.247 (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]