Talk:Canadian Gaelic/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

As there has been no reponse to the template, tags or talk page about this article not meeting GA critteria for more than a week, i am starting a reassessment, per the GA request.

Major problems:

The Outlook and development is mostly uncited.
The list of place names with their translations seems like too much detail - other language article do not have this, and there is no indication why it is here (are the Gaelic names o street signs or somesuch?).
There are multiple poorly integrated additions of text since this became GA, particularly in later sections. These need rewriting to give better readability and flow and elimiate single sentence paragraphs.
A lot of the above noted uncited and poorly written additions are for too detailed information, such as specific school that teach the language or other specific uses of the language. Only important examples need including, with citations from secondary sources thast indicate someone thinks these are important, rather than primary sources that look like advertising.Yob Mod 10:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If no action taken within a few days, this article should be failed for failing criteria 1, 2, and 3.Yob Mod 10:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No response, and needs a lot of work, therefore delisted.Yob Mod 13:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]