Talk:Camrose, Alberta

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Alberta / Communities / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camrose, Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change proposal: Fix the rather suspicious description of the college[edit]

I don't like the way part of section 7.2 is worded, specifically the part that begins with "as a Faculty of the University of Alberta...", ends with Template:Citation Needed, and sounds like it came straight out of a brochure (no seriously, I can practically hear "Stellaris MegaCorp OST - The March of Profits" while reading it). I think, in order to stay in line with Wikipedia's purpose (and avoid meeting WP:G11 in that section), we should either either resolve the Citation needed to determine if it came from an advertisement, figure out a way to reword it in an unbiased way, or both.

I saw another page (one about a supposedly "academic" society I'm part of, so I'd be lying if I said I wasn't slightly disappointed with my peers...) get deleted and locked for similar G11 concerns, so while this is only a part of the page and probably not as severe, I'm nonetheless a little concerned. We can do better than this!--Macks2008 (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]