This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Is there a more specific name that will work for this article? At the very least, it should be renamed to Camelback potential, but I'll wait for other feedback before any renames. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely move it to your suggestion, or I can if you don't have that bit. I do find it a bit amusing that we have to fix the camel casing on this article in particular... Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @Maury Markowitz and Power~enwiki: I moved it as suggested because that's complying with guideline on article titles WP:NCCAPS, and I don't think anybody can object with superior argument as per as the previous capitalization concern —Ammarpad (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
