Talk:Callebaut

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Callebaut article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Blanchardb (talk · contribs) on 23 February 2010 with the comment:
Chocolatier with no assertion of notability. Only sources are two primary sources and a directory.
It was contested by Cnilep (talk · contribs) on 2010-02-24 with the comment:
Sources are available; I have added one.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my grandparents owned this company. :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.162.106 (talk) 02:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of some Canadian chocolate shop opened by some guy distantly related to the founder of this company[edit]

This article is about a Belgian chocolate company, a multinational and one of the biggest of the world. It says so in the opening lines Callebaut was a Belgian company and a major producer of chocolate for consumers and for professional chocolatiers. The canadian company is unrelated to this company except that the founder of that company is the great-great grandson of the guy who originally founded this company. For the rest there is no relation. It says so in the article itself: This firm (called Chocolaterie Bernard Callebaut) was not affiliated with Callebaut or with the new company Barry Callebaut. It makes no sense to make one article about two different and unrelated companies just because the founders are very distant family. Maybe in the trivia section it could be interesting to add something like "The great-great grandson of the founder of Callebaut started a little chocolate shop in Canada." But detailed information like this is frivelous.--83.128.115.179 (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I whole heartedly agree. Bernard Callebaut has neither current economic relationship nor historical company ties to the Belgian Callebaut or Barry Callebaut. Bernard Callebaut (the person) is of the Callebaut family but he moved to Canada to begin his own chocolate company, distinct from the Belgian Callebaut. I saw we remove the bit about external link to Bernard Callebaut from this wiki page!

POV Concerns[edit]

It appears that this article is... Not entirely neutral. It constantly says how great and high-quality the chocolate is without so much as mentioning any negative opinions. I'd suggest fixing that. Ntb612 (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As editor of this article (and it was quite the project to tackle!) I would like to point out that the original article read almost entirely as an advertisement/a commercial brochure. I did my utter best to keep my additions as neutral as possible. But the fact of the matter is that Callebaut is an authority in the world of chocolate and is known worldwide for its premium quality, workability and taste. I felt it was only right to portray the company and its products as such.Lotofaag (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC+1)

I think you are both right, but a more neutral twist gives the article more credibility (hence why I fixed that). Editor from Belgium (talk) 13:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC+1)

Ruby Chocolate[edit]

I shared this news about Callebaut's alleged new chocolate discovery/creation on the Chocolate and Types of chocolate talk pages. It's probably a little too early to jump all over this, since news outlets are voicing some skepticism. In other words, it looks as if some verification may be needed before this is an official thing. But if it does turn out to be legitimate, ruby chocolate ought to be added to this article under "Innovations." Just something to watch. Kerdooskis (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Callebaut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]