Talk:Calder Valley line

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Calder Valley line is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Calder Valley Line RDT.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Manchester to York and Selby lines.

Cleanup[edit]

I added the cleanup tag because the list of principle destinations is in a bit of a mess. I tried fixing it myself but I couldn't get it to work mh. 00:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done a little bit of tinkering on the formatting, but left the clean-up tag as I think it could still do with some work on the conent Biscit 11:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Route diagram[edit]

The section "Bradford - Halifax" appears to include much more detail than is on the route diagram. Should the diagram be updated to show the other lines and stations even if they are disused now? Keith D (talk) 12:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add more detail, as I did for Template:Penistone Line, otherwise the route is no better than that on the WYPTE web site. Some other lines in the UK (such as Template:South Western Main Line) include this information already. However I'm new to this, so I don't want to step on any toes :) Scillystuff (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Calder Valley line/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires cleanup
Requires photographs
Requires copy-edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 10:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Calder Valley line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

I have made a start on an update. Northern Sparks report added with cite and I will also add IRP GRALISTAIR (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COPYVIO?[edit]

The route section of this article is very odd. The long bullet lists have multiple entries stating "here was x" and "here was y". It looks very much like this unreferenced content is actually a copy/paste from another work. A quick google doesn't reveal what that work is, but without supporting references I propose to ~~remove it~~ edit-down/refactor/restyle within the near future. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surely a few short bullet points that can be edited don't constitute a massive copyvio, if you could even find where they might be from. Rcsprinter123 (yarn) 17:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, except it's several subsections in the article, so it's a lot of text. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a copyvio, more likely some railway aficionado who knows the route very well. Lots of northern railway articles are like this (see Harrogate line for instance). Are you proposing that we insert cites to state these places existed/exist, or that it is too unwieldy for an article? Ta and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does the CVL encompass?[edit]

I think we need to decide what is on this line and what isn't. There is a statement on the page that Today, Hebden Bridge and Leeds are the only stations where every service calls, the route description follows. If we go by the map then this is patently untrue as all services will have to reverse at Bradford, and call there to set down and pick-up passengers. However the map does not show the section through Mirfield from Wakefield, which isn't part of the Calder Valley line proper, but CVL services do use it. Further problems are images of trains passing Mirfield, which again, according to the map isn't on the CVL. The Northern timetable does list the services through Mirfield/Huddersfield etc, but no map.^[1] Calderdale council consider the CVL to be the same as the map on the article page, but shows the additional services through Mirfield etc.^[2] Thoughts? Is this just a simple mapping upgrade? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "N36 Leeds to Manchester Victoria" (PDF). northernrailway.co.uk. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
^ "Calder Valley Line – Developing a Strategic Vision". calderdale.gov.uk. Retrieved 27 March 2022.

[1] "N36 Leeds to Manchester Victoria" (PDF). northernrailway.co.uk. Retrieved 27 March 2022.

[2] "Calder Valley Line – Developing a Strategic Vision". calderdale.gov.uk. Retrieved 27 March 2022.

[1]

[2]